On July 21, 2024, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) withdrew its appeal against a Fifth Circuit judge's decision to enjoin its final rule on joint-employer status. This move, announced in a court filing, signals the NLRB's intention to reevaluate the issues raised by the district court.
The American Hotel & Lodging Association (AHLA), which has actively opposed the joint-employer rule, celebrated the withdrawal as a significant victory. AHLA Interim President and CEO Kevin Carey highlighted that this decision helps preserve the franchise business model crucial to hoteliers across the nation. The rule in question sought to clarify that an entity could be considered a "joint employer" if it shared or determined key employment terms with another entity's employees, potentially increasing the liability for hotel owners and franchisees.
The Asian American Hotel Owners Association (AAHOA) echoed AHLA's sentiments, with Chairman Miraj Patel emphasizing that the withdrawal ensures hotel owners are not unfairly held responsible for employment practices they do not control. This concern was central to a broader legal challenge against the rule, joined by various business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the International Franchise Association, which argued that the rule unfairly targeted small businesses and franchisees.
The NLRB's rule has been a contentious issue, particularly in light of labor unions' support, including from the AFL-CIO, which argued that it would ensure fair bargaining for workers. The NLRB had initially appealed the court's decision to block the rule, but the recent withdrawal reflects a reconsideration in light of ongoing legal and regulatory debates, especially following the Supreme Court's recent ruling on the Chevron doctrine. This ruling has significant implications for federal agencies' authority, potentially leading to varied legal interpretations and enforcement across different jurisdictions.
As the NLRB reviews its stance, the hospitality industry and labor groups continue to monitor the evolving legal landscape, balancing concerns over business autonomy and workers' rights.
Comments